Practitioner Enquiry? Oh, you mean action research?

Our Lead Practitioner @joleavercole ‘s group of Researching Teachers was made up of teachers involved in her Excellent Teaching Programme, which uses action research and coaching to improve classroom practice.  I had suggested that the group should be called “Practitioner Enquiry”. but this was meaningless to teachers, whereas they valued and understood the concept of “action research”. Miss B had a clear plan for her action research. Screen Shot 2015-03-12 at 16.30.00   Her methodology was well thought out and she shared her results with her group and used her findings to change practice across KS3 RE – her leadership role.

Dylan William would describe this as practitioner enquiry rather than action research.  What further information/investigation would qualify this work as research? Do we blur the lines too much when we research as part of our practice? However, if research is more pure and conducted across large populations by experts, as happened when the school was part of a randomised control trial with the EEF, are the findings as useful for our practice?

Advertisements
Practitioner Enquiry? Oh, you mean action research?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s